Golden State Foreclosure Starts Lowest Since Late 2005

-

WASHINGTON, D.C. – April 23, 2013 – (RealEstateRama) — The number of California homeowners entering the foreclosure process plunged to the lowest level in more than seven years last quarter. The unusually sharp drop in the number of mortgage default notices filed by lenders stems mainly from rising home values, a strengthening economy and government efforts to reduce foreclosures, a real estate information service reported.

During first-quarter 2013 lenders recorded 18,567 Notices of Default (NoDs) on California houses and condos. That was down 51.4 percent from 38,212 during the prior three months, and down 67.0 percent from 56,258 in first-quarter 2012, according to San Diego-based DataQuick.

Last quarter’s number was the lowest since 15,337 NoDs were recorded in fourth-quarter 2005. NoDs peaked in first-quarter 2009 at 135,431. DataQuick’s NoD statistics go back to 1992.

“Foreclosure starts were already trending much lower late last year because of rising home prices, a stronger labor market and the settlement agreement between the government and some lenders. But it appears last quarter’s drop was especially sharp because of a package of new state foreclosure laws – the ‘Homeowner Bill of Rights’ – that took effect January 1. Default notices fell off a cliff in January, then edged up. In recent years we’ve seen temporary lulls in foreclosure activity after new laws kick in and lenders adjust. It’s certainly possible foreclosure starts will pick up at some point this year if lenders need to play a lot of catch-up,” said John Walsh, DataQuick president.

“Rising home prices will be key to the final mop-up of the foreclosure mess,” he added. “As values rise, fewer people owe more than their homes are worth, and more people can refinance into a more favorable loan. It also means more who fall on hard times can sell their homes for enough to pay off the loan.”

The median price paid for a California home last quarter was $297,000, up 22.7 percent from a year ago, DataQuick reported.

NoD filings fell in all home price categories last quarter. But mortgage defaults remained more concentrated in California’s most affordable neighborhoods. Zip codes with first-quarter 2013 median sale prices below $200,000 collectively saw 2.9 NoDs filed for every 1,000 homes in those zip codes. The ratio was 1.9 NoDs per 1,000 homes for zip codes with $200,000 to $800,000 medians, while there were 0.7 NoDs filed per 1,000 homes for the group of zips with medians above $800,000.

Most of the loans going into default are still from the 2005-2007 period. The median origination quarter for defaulted loans is still third-quarter 2006. That has been the case for more than three years, indicating that weak underwriting standards peaked then.

On primary mortgages, California homeowners were a median 8.6 months behind on their payments when the lender filed the Notice of Default. The borrowers owed a median $14,380 on a median $310,000 mortgage.

On home equity loans and lines of credit in default, borrowers owed a median $4,971 on a median $68,099 credit line. The amount of the credit line that was actually in use cannot be determined from public records.

The most active “beneficiaries” in the formal foreclosure process last quarter were Wells Fargo (5,546), JP Morgan Chase (3,863) and Bank of America (2,565).

The trustees who pursued the highest number of defaults last quarter were Recontrust Co. (mainly for Bank of America and Bank of New York), Quality Loan Service Corp (Wells Fargo and others) and Trustee Corps (for Green Tree Servicing, JP Morgan Chase and others).

San Diego-based DataQuick monitors real estate activity nationwide and provides information to consumers, educational institutions, public agencies, lending institutions, title companies and industry analysts. Notices of Default are recorded at county recorders offices and mark the first step of the formal foreclosure process.

Although 18,567 default notices were filed last quarter, they involved 18,010 homes because some borrowers were in default on multiple loans (e.g. a primary mortgage and a line of credit).

Among the state’s larger counties, loans were least likely to go into default last quarter in San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Marin counties, based on an analysis of how many NoDs were filed for every 1,000 homes in existence. The probability was highest in Riverside, San Bernardino, Solano and San Joaquin counties. The analysis excluded counties with fewer than 50,000 homes.

Trustees Deeds recorded (TDs), or the finalized loss of a home to the formal foreclosure process, dropped to a six-year low last quarter. TDs totaled 13,591, down 35.7 percent from 21,127 foreclosures in the prior quarter, and down 55.1 percent from 30,261 foreclosures in first-quarter 2012. Last quarter’s foreclosure tally was the lowest for any quarter since first-quarter 2007, when 11,032 homes were foreclosed on. The all-time peak was 79,511 foreclosures in third-quarter 2008. The state’s all-time low was 637 in second-quarter 2005, DataQuick reported.

Just as with mortgage default filings, foreclosures remained far more concentrated in the state’s most affordable communities. Zip codes with first-quarter 2013 median sale prices below $200,000 collectively saw 2.9 homes foreclosed on for every 1,000 homes in existence. That compares with 1.2 foreclosures per 1,000 homes for zips with medians from $200,000 to $800,000, and 0.3 foreclosures per 1,000 homes in the group of zips with medians over $800,000.

On average, homes foreclosed on last quarter took 8.1 months to wind their way through the formal foreclosure process, beginning with an NoD. That’s down from an average of 8.9 months the prior quarter and down from 8.5 months a year earlier.

At formal foreclosure auctions held statewide last quarter, an estimated 47.6 percent of the foreclosed properties were bought by investors or others that don’t appear to be lender or government entities. That was up from an estimated 41.7 percent the previous quarter and up from 33.7 percent a year earlier, DataQuick reported.

Foreclosure resales – properties foreclosed on in the prior 12 months – accounted for 17.3 percent of all California resale activity last quarter. That was up slightly from 16.6 percent the prior quarter and down from 33.6 percent a year ago. Foreclosure resales peaked at 57.8 percent in first-quarter 2009. Among the state’s larger counties last quarter, foreclosure resales varied from 6.9 percent in San Francisco County to 29.9 percent in Tulare County.

Lenders’ shift toward short sales as a foreclosure alternative has helped lower foreclosure activity in recent years. Short sales – transactions where the sale price fell short of what was owed on the property – made up an estimated 20.2 percent of the state’s resale market last quarter. That was down from an estimated 24.2 percent the prior quarter and 24.8 percent a year earlier. However, the estimated number (rather than percentage) of short sales last quarter dipped just 1.5 percent from first-quarter 2012.

Notices of Default (Trustees Deeds further down)
houses and condos  County/Region    2012Q1    2012Q4    2013Q1    Qtr-Qtr %chng    Yr/Yr %chng

Los Angeles                11,443    8,100    3,985    -50.8%    -65.2%
Orange                     3,733    2,169    1,282    -40.9%    -65.7%
San Diego                  4,185    2,655    1,471    -44.6%    -64.8%
Riverside                  5,542    3,887    1,807    -53.5%    -67.4%
San Bernardino             4,722    3,165    1,667    -47.3%    -64.7%
Ventura                    1,255    728    411    -43.6%    -67.3%
Socal                      30,880    20,704    10,622    -48.7%    -65.6%

San Francisco              340    236    103    -56.4%    -69.7%
Alameda                    1,860    1,194    555    -53.5%    -70.2%
Contra Costa               2,251    1,342    785    -41.5%    -65.1%
Santa Clara                1,496    867    441    -49.1%    -70.5%
San Mateo                  612    346    216    -37.6%    -64.7%
Marin                      209    149    87    -41.6%    -58.4%
Solano                     1,146    696    345    -50.4%    -69.9%
Sonoma                     698    452    194    -57.1%    -72.2%
Napa                       179    117    46    -60.7%    -74.3%
Bay Area                   8,791    5,399    2,771    -48.7%    -68.5%

Santa Cruz                 220    168    74    -56.2%    -66.5%
Santa Barbara              481    316    147    -53.5%    -69.4%
San Luis Obispo            291    221    100    -54.8%    -65.6%
Monterey                   471    377    142    -62.3%    -69.9%
Coast                      1,463    1,082    463    -57.2%    -68.4%

Sacramento                 3,464    2,195    1,022    -53.4%    -70.5%
San Joaquin                1,572    1,098    465    -57.7%    -70.4%
Placer                     735    469    173    -63.0%    -76.4%
Kern                       1,641    1,082    503    -53.5%    -69.3%
Fresno                     1,555    1,150    550    -52.1%    -64.6%
Madera                     262    209    100    -52.2%    -61.8%
Merced                     415    332    140    -57.8%    -66.3%
Tulare                     796    515    274    -46.8%    -65.6%
Yolo                       277    173    70    -59.5%    -74.7%
El Dorado                  340    262    117    -55.3%    -65.6%
Stanislaus                 1,170    798    315    -60.6%    -73.1%
Kings                      186    172    73    -57.6%    -60.8%
San Benito                 79    65    26    -60.0%    -67.1%
Yuba                       189    114    55    -51.8%    -70.9%
Colusa                     32    18    10    -44.4%    -68.8%
Sutter                     177    121    57    -52.9%    -67.8%
Central Valley             12,890    8,773    3,950    -55.0%    -69.4%

Mountains*                 663    551    225    -59.2%    -66.1%

North Calif*               1,314    1,528    434    -71.6%    -66.9%

Statewide*                 56,258    38,212    18,567    -51.4%    -67.0%

includes additional counties

Trustees Deeds Recorded (number of homes foreclosed on)
houses and condos  County/Region     2012Q1     2012Q4     2013Q1     Qtr-Qtr %chng     Yr/Yr %chng

Los Angeles                4,723    3,496    2,217    -36.6%    -53.1%
Orange                     1,521    941    572    -39.2%    -62.4%
San Diego                  1,862    1,285    882    -31.4%    -52.6%
Riverside                  3,291    2,400    1,379    -42.5%    -58.1%
San Bernardino             2,713    2,025    1,363    -32.7%    -49.8%
Ventura                    552    330    255    -22.7%    -53.8%
Socal                      14,662    10,477    6,668    -36.3%    -54.5%

San Francisco              151    79    53    -32.9%    -64.9%
Alameda                    1,152    541    375    -30.7%    -67.4%
Contra Costa               1,285    779    528    -32.2%    -58.9%
Santa Clara                681    330    194    -41.2%    -71.5%
San Mateo                  261    149    92    -38.3%    -64.8%
Marin                      118    56    52    -7.1%    -55.9%
Solano                     679    500    240    -52.0%    -64.7%
Sonoma                     397    269    154    -42.8%    -61.2%
Napa                       111    62    54    -12.9%    -51.4%
Bay Area                   4,835    2,765    1,742    -37.0%    -64.0%

Santa Cruz                 135    87    65    -25.3%    -51.9%
Santa Barbara              258    177    106    -40.1%    -58.9%
San Luis Obispo            187    123    74    -39.8%    -60.4%
Monterey                   293    180    132    -26.7%    -54.9%
Coast                      873    567    377    -33.5%    -56.8%

Sacramento                 2,225    1,639    917    -44.1%    -58.8%
San Joaquin                985    703    438    -37.7%    -55.5%
Placer                     451    281    215    -23.5%    -52.3%
Kern                       981    744    502    -32.5%    -48.8%
Fresno                     1,004    770    508    -34.0%    -49.4%
Madera                     204    145    124    -14.5%    -39.2%
Merced                     333    255    169    -33.7%    -49.2%
Tulare                     441    350    221    -36.9%    -49.9%
Yolo                       157    123    76    -38.2%    -51.6%
El Dorado                  198    146    90    -38.4%    -54.5%
Stanislaus                 827    512    371    -27.5%    -55.1%
Kings                      116    108    77    -28.7%    -33.6%
San Benito                 63    30    19    -36.7%    -69.8%
Yuba                       136    68    47    -30.9%    -65.4%
Colusa                     28    18    13    -27.8%    -53.6%
Sutter                     146    104    49    -52.9%    -66.4%
Central Valley             8,295    5,996    3,836    -36.0%    -53.8%

Mountains*                 438    351    261    -25.6%    -40.4%

North Calif*               966    844    618    -26.8%    -36.0%

Statewide*                 30,261    21,127    13,591    -35.7%    -55.1%

* includes additional counties

Source: DataQuick; DQNews.com

Media calls: Andrew LePage (916) 456-7157

SHARE
Avatar

California RealEstateRama is an Internet based Real Estate News and Press Release distributor chanel of RealEstateRama for California Real Estate publishing community.

RealEstateRama staff editor manage to selection and verify the real estate news for State of California.

Contact:

Previous articleIDX, Inc. brings dynamic online property search to California clients of Jesse Madison
Next articleRep. Campbell’s Opening Statement at Today’s Financial Services Hearing on Building a Sustainable Housing Finance System